← back to the Substrate Record
qid 1756 · law
Question: A victim was standing on a street corner waiting to make a drug buy. The drug dealer was always late, so the victim continued to wait outside in the freezing cold weather because he needed a quick fix. Suddenly a car rounded the street corner and a shot rang out. The victim slumped over and fell to the sidewalk. Immediately after being shot and before he died, the victim exclaimed, "The defendant did it!" The defendant was indicted and is now on trial for the victim's murder. Based on these facts alone, the admissibility of the victim's statement should be determined by
- the jury, after a preliminary determination by the judge.
- the jury, without a preliminary determination by the judge.
- the judge, only after consultation with a legal expert.
- the judge, with instruction to the jury that it may consider the dying declaration if it determines that the victim knew he was dying.
- the police department that conducted the initial investigation.
- the jury, with instruction from the judge that it may disregard the dying declaration if it determines the victim was under duress.
- the jury, with a requirement to cross-examine the statement with other presented evidence.
- the judge, without assistance from the jury.
- a third-party mediator, to prevent any bias.
Our answer: H. the judge, without assistance from the jury. Source quote machine-checked (exact quote)
How it was answered
Stored method, replayed by code (kind: formula)
Current source
Advisory Committee Notes to Federal Rule of Evidence 104 (quoting McCormick), as reproduced at courtrules.net
https://www.courtrules.net/federal/evidence/rule-104
Source quote machine-checked (exact quote)
Earlier version (superseded)
No public source has been found for this card yet (3 places checked internally).