← back to the Substrate Record
qid 1637 · law
Question: A seat in a movie theater collapsed, causing the customer sitting in that seat to fall to the ground and suffer a back injury. In a personal injury action by the customer against the theater, the customer will most likely
- not recover, because the customer assumed the risk by choosing to sit in the seat.
- not recover, unless the customer had informed the theater about the faulty seat before the accident.
- recover, only if the theater had received previous complaints about the seat.
- recover, if the theater failed to put up a warning sign about the faulty seat.
- recover, only if the theater had prior knowledge of the dangerous condition of the seat.
- recover, only if the customer can prove the theater's negligence in maintaining the seat.
- not recover, unless the theater failed to make a reasonable inspection of the seats for the safety of its customers.
- not recover, because the customer did not suffer any permanent injury.
- not recover, because the theater was under no obligation to inspect the premises to discover unknown dangers.
Our answer: G. not recover, unless the theater failed to make a reasonable inspection of the seats for the safety of its customers. Source quote machine-checked (exact quote)
How it was answered
Stored method, replayed by code (kind: formula)
Current source
LegalClarity, "Invitee vs. Licensee: Key Differences in Premises Liability"
https://legalclarity.org/invitee-vs-licensee-key-differences-in-premises-liability/
Source quote machine-checked (exact quote)
Earlier version (superseded)
No public source has been found for this card yet (3 places checked internally).