← back to the Substrate Record

qid 1590 · law

Question: A homeowner was holding his annual party at his home. His parties attracted a wide variety of diverse individuals. On the night in question, a defendant was loafing at the local bar when a number of the invited guests came in to purchase spirits for the party. The defendant decided to crash the party. He arrived at the homeowner's house around midnight when the party was in full swing. He went in through the front door, which was unlocked, and easily mingled with the other partygoers. During the party, the defendant wandered through the house and came upon a baseball, signed by a famous baseball player, in a glass case. Knowing the ball to be very valuable, the defendant put it under his jacket and made his way down the stairs and out the front door. If the defendant is subsequently charged with burglary, he will probably be found

  1. guilty, because he stole a valuable item.
  2. not guilty, because he did not use force to enter the house.
  3. not guilty, because the front door was unlocked.
  4. guilty, because he intended to steal the baseball.
  5. guilty, because he didn't have an invitation to the party.
  6. not guilty, because he crashed the party only to have a good time.
  7. guilty, because he crashed the party.
  8. not guilty, because he left the party without causing any harm.
  9. guilty, because he had the intention to commit a crime inside the house.
  10. not guilty, because he did not break into the house.

Our answer: F. not guilty, because he crashed the party only to have a good time. Source quote machine-checked (at mint)

A machine check confirms the quoted words appear at the source. A person has not yet reviewed these. EARN MARKS as a Human Reviewer

How it was answered

Stored formula / worked method, replayed by code

Criminal law. Common law burglary applied to a stated fact pattern: a rule maze whose recalled thing is the rule and whose fork is the concurrence requirement.

card: formula · card sha256 1be7ff943ab9c0ea…

Current source

Wayne R. LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law, Section 21.1 (burglary). Section number verified as the burglary section by archive.org full text (cited as "Wayne R. LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law Section 21.1 (2d ed. 2003)" in a burglary discussion at archive.org item cbtmultistatebar0000cali). The 2d ed. 2003 locator is the one this dispatch verified; the hand-carry named a 3d ed. 2018.

Source weak (edition_page)

retrieved 2026-09-16T22:14:06.748Z

addendum formula_qid1590.formula_ADDENDUM_source · sha256 b96250a7b94d6d50…

If you have a Citable Source to dispute or challenge this, ADD IT so we can correct the answer by appending, never deleting. — hello@lianabanyan.com