← back to the Substrate Record

qid 1398 · law

Question: A plaintiff sued a trucking company for injuries allegedly suffered when a speeding truck jackknifed and struck her car. Which of the following pieces of evidence, if offered by the plaintiff, is most likely to be admitted by the court?

  1. Testimony from the plaintiff's doctor about her previous health conditions.
  2. Testimony of a surprise witness to the accident when the court is willing to grant the trucking company a continuance to prepare for crossexamination.
  3. Testimony from the plaintiff's boss concerning the amount of time she has missed work, when payroll records had already been admitted as evidence of the plaintiff's lost wages.
  4. Testimony from the plaintiff's mother about her daughter's pain and suffering.
  5. Testimony concerning subsequent repairs to the truck paid for by the trucking company where they have stipulated to ownership.
  6. Testimony from the trucking company's insurance company about their willingness to settle the case.
  7. Color pictures of a plastic surgeon operating on the plaintiff showing the incision and bloody surgical tools.
  8. Testimony from a mechanic who inspected the truck after the accident and found it to be in perfect condition.
  9. Testimony from the truck driver's spouse concerning the driver's habit of speeding.
  10. Photographs of the plaintiff's car before the accident, showing it in a damaged state.

Our answer: B. Testimony of a surprise witness to the accident when the court is willing to grant the trucking company a continuance to prepare for crossexamination. Source quote machine-checked (exact quote)

A machine check confirms the quoted words appear at the source. A person has not yet reviewed these. EARN MARKS as a Human Reviewer

How it was answered

Stored method, replayed by code (kind: formula)

card: formula · card sha256 ab1ce46b6f0650cf…

Current source

Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 403, Advisory Committee Notes (Cornell LII)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_403

“the granting of a continuance is a more appropriate remedy than exclusion of the evidence”

Source quote machine-checked (exact quote)

retrieved 2026-09-17T23:56:30.410Z

page text sha256 a37f13d2d8ffa896… · content sha256 351f246e1d9fd4f3…

addendum formula_qid1398.formula_ADDENDUM_source_rs20260917T235630Z · sha256 de7c65ab11a0ee0a… · replaces the version below, addendum sha256 d388cb4da16706eb…

Earlier version (superseded)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_37

Source weak (http_get_200_text_and_question_terms)

retrieved 2026-09-17T00:33:17.361Z

page text sha256 ef8f82fb143e170a… · content sha256

addendum formula_qid1398.formula_ADDENDUM_source_relabel_unverified20260917T012453Z · sha256 d388cb4da16706eb… · replaces the version below, addendum sha256 f34b9ec0e15dbc00…

Earlier version (superseded)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_37

Source weak (http_get_200_text_and_question_terms)

retrieved 2026-09-17T00:33:17.361Z

page text sha256 ef8f82fb143e170a… · content sha256

addendum formula_qid1398.formula_ADDENDUM_source_bf20260917T003317Z · sha256 f34b9ec0e15dbc00… · replaces the version below, addendum sha256 1d3eaa7ae4d2b386…

Earlier version (superseded)

No public source has been found for this card yet (3 places checked internally).

addendum formula_qid1398.formula_ADDENDUM_source · sha256 1d3eaa7ae4d2b386…

If you have a Citable Source to dispute or challenge this, ADD IT so we can correct the answer by appending, never deleting. — hello@lianabanyan.com