← back to the Substrate Record

qid 1333 · law

Question: One morning, an employee arrived at work and found his boss passed out on the floor of his office. The employee determined that his boss was not breathing, immediately rendered CPR to his boss, and succeeded in reviving him. The employee then called the paramedics, who took the boss to the hospital. Two week later, the boss returned to work. Grateful for the employee's quick action in saving his life, the boss said to the employee, "You'll have ajob with me for life. "Which of the following best characterizes the legal relationship between the boss and the employee on that date?

  1. Since the employee gratuitously rendered assistance to the boss, there was insufficient consideration to support the boss's subsequent promise to provide the employee with lifetime employment.
  2. The boss had a duty to pay the employee reasonable compensation for saving his life, based upon a contract implied-in-fact.
  3. The employee had a valid enforceable contract due to the boss's promise.
  4. The employee's act of saving the boss's life constituted a legally enforceable contract.
  5. The employee's act of saving the boss's life was sufficient past consideration to render enforceable the boss's subsequent promise.
  6. The boss's promise was not legally binding as it was made under duress.
  7. The employee's act of saving the boss's life was a gift and did not create a contractual obligation.
  8. The boss's promise was voidable due to lack of consideration.
  9. &s per the boss's oral promise, the employee had an enforceable lifetime employment contract.
  10. The boss was under no legal obligation to promise the employee anything.

Our answer: A. Since the employee gratuitously rendered assistance to the boss, there was insufficient consideration to support the boss's subsequent promise to provide the employee with lifetime employment. Source quote machine-checked (exact quote)

A machine check confirms the quoted words appear at the source. A person has not yet reviewed these. EARN MARKS as a Human Reviewer

How it was answered

Multi-step solver (maze), replayed by code

card: maze · card sha256 dc7d922c27d6749a…

Current source

Wikipedia, "Consideration"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consideration

“Past consideration is not a valid consideration and has no legal value. Past consideration is consideration that has already flowed from the promisee to the promisor.”

Source quote machine-checked (exact quote)

retrieved 2026-09-18T01:27:55.826Z

page text sha256 844f2cd408e8fceb… · content sha256 33553e7f6dd166f4…

addendum maze_qid1333_b4_maze_input_ADDENDUM_source_rs20260918T012755Z · sha256 a8437b9b5f1e4a94… · replaces the version below, addendum sha256 b6d7c4e37a620790…

Earlier version (superseded)

No public source has been found for this card yet (3 places checked internally).

addendum maze_qid1333_b4_maze_input_ADDENDUM_source · sha256 b6d7c4e37a620790…

If you have a Citable Source to dispute or challenge this, ADD IT so we can correct the answer by appending, never deleting. — hello@lianabanyan.com