← back to the Substrate Record

qid 1300 · law

Question: Assume this question takes place in a "lien theory" state. A woman and her co-habiting partner share a property as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. He has run up debts that he did not tell her about, and so he uses his interest in the property to secretly get a mortgage from the bank. When he dies, the bank attempts to execute on the mortgage. Can it do so? Apply the majority view on this issue.

  1. No, although the mortgage destroyed the joint tenancy, the bank has to get a deed of trust in order to execute on jointly owned property.
  2. No, the bank cannot execute on the mortgage because the property was jointly owned and one partner cannot unilaterally mortgage the property without the other's consent.
  3. No, the bank cannot execute on the mortgage because the woman has the right of survivorship, which overrides the partner's debts.
  4. Yes, the bank can execute on the mortgage because the partner's debt is considered a lien on the property, which overrides the joint tenancy.
  5. Yes, the bank can execute on the mortgage because the partner used his interest in the property as collateral for the loan.
  6. Yes, the bank can execute on the mortgage because the joint tenancy is considered severed when one partner incurs a debt without the knowledge of the other.
  7. Yes, the bank got title to the property by virtue of the mortgage, which destroyed the joint tenancy, and it can execute on its lien.
  8. Yes, the mortgage was the equivalent of a deed of trust and the joint tenancy was severed by the mortgage lien, giving the bank unfettered legal authority to execute on its mortgage.
  9. No, the mortgage lien could not destroy the joint tenancy, and when the partner dies, the property passes by operation of law to the surviving joint tenant.
  10. No, the bank cannot execute on the mortgage because the majority view in a "lien theory" state is that a mortgage does not sever a joint tenancy.

Our answer: I. No, the mortgage lien could not destroy the joint tenancy, and when the partner dies, the property passes by operation of law to the surviving joint tenant. Source quote machine-checked (exact quote)

A machine check confirms the quoted words appear at the source. A person has not yet reviewed these. EARN MARKS as a Human Reviewer

How it was answered

Multi-step solver (maze), replayed by code

card: maze · card sha256 6a3654ae1487a396…

Current source

Harms v. Sprague, 105 Ill. 2d 215 (1984), full opinion text, Justia

https://law.justia.com/cases/illinois/supreme-court/1984/59515-7.html

“In Peoples Trust & Savings Bank v. Haas (1927), 328 Ill. 468, the court found that a judgment lien secured against one joint tenant did not serve to extinguish the joint tenancy. As such, the surviving joint tenant "succeeded to the title in fee to the whole of the land by operation of law."”

Source quote machine-checked (exact quote)

retrieved 2026-09-18T01:07:52.756Z

page text sha256 521c515315f99fe1… · content sha256 bf52d375b2830fd5…

addendum maze_qid1300_b4_maze_input_ADDENDUM_source_rs20260918T010752Z · sha256 bbd40717de7a4867… · replaces the version below, addendum sha256 19ecf3937fe0dd09…

Earlier version (superseded)

No public source has been found for this card yet (3 places checked internally).

addendum maze_qid1300_b4_maze_input_ADDENDUM_source · sha256 19ecf3937fe0dd09…

If you have a Citable Source to dispute or challenge this, ADD IT so we can correct the answer by appending, never deleting. — hello@lianabanyan.com