← back to the Substrate Record
qid 11122 · philosophy
Question: Use indirect truth tables to determine whether each set of propositions is consistent. If the set is consistent, choose an option with a consistent valuation. (There may be other consistent valuations.) (T ⊃ U) ⊃ (W ⊃ U) T ⊃ ~(U ⊃ X) (T ⊃ ~X) ⊃ W
- Inconsistent. Inconsistent valuation when T, U, W and X are all false
- Inconsistent. Inconsistent valuation when T, U, W and X are all true
- Consistent. Consistent valuation when T, U and X are true and W is false
- Consistent. Consistent valuation when U, W, and X are true and T is false
- Inconsistent
Our answer: D. Consistent. Consistent valuation when U, W, and X are true and T is false Source quote machine-checked (exact quote)
How it was answered
Stored method, replayed by code (kind: formula)
Current source
Humanities LibreTexts, Thinking Well: A Logic and Critical Thinking Textbook (Lavin), 7.5 Logical Analysis Using Truth Tables
Source quote machine-checked (exact quote)
Earlier version (superseded)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_conditional
Source weak (http_get_200_text_and_question_terms)
Earlier version (superseded)
No public source has been found for this card yet (2 places checked internally).