← back to the Substrate Record
qid 11093 · philosophy
Question: In his discussion of discrimination in war, Valls suggests that
- the concept of combatants and noncombatants is outdated and irrelevant.
- "terrorism" should be defined as violence against noncombatants.
- there is no difference between combatants and noncombatants.
- the difference between combatants and noncombatants is largely ambiguous.
- the difference between combatants and noncombatants is categorical and clear.
- "terrorism" should be defined as indiscriminate violence.
- there is a fine line between combatants and noncombatants.
- "terrorism" should be defined as violence excluding war.
- the difference between combatants and noncombatants is subjective and varies with perspective.
- the difference between combatants and noncombatants is a matter of degree.
Our answer: J. the difference between combatants and noncombatants is a matter of degree. Source pending
Source pending. No public source has passed the machine check for this card yet.
Know a citable source for this fact? See the Research Marks bounty poster.
How it was answered
Multi-step solver (maze), replayed by code
Current source
No public source has been found for this card yet (3 places checked internally).
If you have a Citable Source to dispute or challenge this, ADD IT so we can correct the answer by appending, never deleting. — hello@lianabanyan.com